|
|
| Health Inequality |
- Introduction
- Material Deprivation
- Social Deprivation
- Deprivation in the South East
- Conclusion
|
| 1. Introduction The
man in the street knows that poverty is bad for health. In addition, the international
evidence on inequalities in health between different sections of society is compelling.
People who live in disadvantaged circumstances have more illness and disability and
shorter lives than those with a better standard of living. 1 As far back as 1981, Nolan2 showed that Irish
men in higher professional positions had a mortality ratio in middle age which was one
third that of men in unskilled occupations. The proportion of adults reporting chronic
illness was twice as high for unskilled as for professional occupations. Lyons et al3 confirmed this finding in
their study in Dublin. Johnson4,5 showed higher death rates in electoral wards in disadvantaged areas
in Dublin.
The size of the differences in health status varies between countries and between
different time periods, and this would suggest that there is nothing fixed or inevitable
about having such a health divide. Greater overall prosperity and improved living
standards have led to significant health gains in this century. However inequalities in
health remain and the gap between socio-economic groups is widening particularly for young
men. 6
The explanations as to the causes of inequalities in health are complex and it can be
difficult to separate the various causes. A combination of factors; including peoples
living and working conditions, their economic and personal resources, their social
relationships and lifestyles are likely to contribute. Much health related behaviour is
socially determined. The cumulative effect over a lifetime, of health damaging or health
promoting physical and social environments may be the main cause of the differences.
Deprivation influences health from conception through childhood, into adulthood and old
age. Davey Smith 7 showed the cumulative effect of socio-economic factors over a lifetime. The
socio-economic classification of occupations was divided into manual occupations, non
manual occupations, managerial and professional occupations; class IV and V being manual
and class I or II being professional and managerial. Men who were born to fathers with
manual jobs and who were in manual jobs themselves, had age adjusted standardised
mortality ratios 70% higher than those who themselves, and their fathers, had non manual
jobs. For those who moved between the occupational classes over the course of their
lifetime, their mortality experience lay somewhere in between. Several studies have been
reported which link socio-economic conditions at birth and in childhood with a range of
adult diseases. Davey Smith 1998,8 attempted to separate these effects from the effect of continuing
deprivation in adult life. Social class in childhood had a specific effect on mortality
from stroke and stomach cancer and had an additive effect on deaths from coronary heart
disease and lung diseases. For other diseases and cancers it was the risk factors present
in adult life that were more important. |

|
| 2. Material Deprivation In
general, the lower the material standard of living (measured by indicators such as income,
car ownership, etc.) the worse, the level of health. There is growing evidence that the
relative distribution of income matters in its own right, for population health. The
experience of relative poverty means that people go short of things considered essential
or normal by others around them. It excludes people socially and materially from the
normal life of society. This sense of being at a relative disadvantage may be an important
indirect influence on health in developed countries by increasing the likelihood of
behavioural risks e.g. smoking, drinking, "comfort" eating. 9
Mortality is related more closely to relative income within countries than to absolute
income between them. National mortality rates tend to be lowest in countries with smaller
income differences.
3. Social Deprivation
A society with greater income equality improves social cohesion and reduces social
divisions and marginalisation. Integration within a social network benefits health.
Socially isolated people die at 2-3 times the rate of people with a network of social
relationships. Kawachi 10 puts forward the theory that this could equally apply to
communities. He demonstrated an association between mortality and low levels of
participation in community activities and measures of civic distrust in 39 states of the
U.S. These were in turn highly correlated with the degree of income inequality in each
state. |
 |
| 4. Deprivation in the
South East A number of indicators of material deprivation have been
formulated internationally. The Directors of Public Health of the eight Health Boards
requested the Small Area Health Research Unit to develop a suitable deprivation measure
for Ireland. The index is statistically calculated from census data for small geographical
areas on; unemployment, social class, proportion of rented accommodation, over crowding
and car ownership. 11
It should be noted that this index is a mathematical calculation, which shows the
ranking of areas from most affluent to most deprived. It does not measure the deprivation
level of individuals or imply that individuals in such areas experience extreme hardship.
The following maps outline the South Eastern Health Board and gives the 518 district
electoral divisions (DED) for the region. The deprivation index level was calculated for
each DED population. The index ranges from level one (most affluent) to level five (most
deprived).
The following maps show the deprivation level for each DED in the region, by county.
Because rural district electoral divisions are larger than urban ones, rural deprived
areas tend to stand out visually more than the urban ones.
District Electoral Division areas classified as level four or five can be considered as
deprived areas. Table 2.1 shows the number of DEDs in each county.
Table 2.1 Number of DEDs in each County
| County |
Number
of DEDs |
| Carlow |
54 |
| Kilkenny |
113 |
| Tipperary South |
98 |
| Waterford |
96 |
| Waterford CB |
34 |
| Wexford |
123 |
Source: Small Area Research Unit |
 |
| Table 2.2 shows the number of DEDs at each
deprivation index level and the proportion of the total that this represents. Table
2.2 No. and Proportion of DEDs at each deprivation level.
| Deprivation Index |
Number of DEDs |
Proportion |
| 1 |
119 |
22.9 |
| 2 |
183 |
35.3 |
| 3 |
110 |
21.2 |
| 4 |
64 |
12.3 |
| 5 |
42 |
8.1 |
| Deprived
4+5 |
106 |
20.4 |
| Total |
518 |
100 |
Source: Small Area Research Unit
It can be seen that 20% of the DEDs in the South East are categorised as deprived
areas.
Table 2.3 shows the proportion of the population in each county who live in deprived
areas (level four or five district electoral divisions). Not everyone living in these
areas is deprived, but rather represents the average level of material deprivation.
Table 2.3 The Proportion of the Population in each county that live in Deprived
Areas (Levels 4 + 5)
| County |
County Population |
Country Level 4 Population |
County Level 5 Population |
% County Population |
| Level 4 area |
Level 5 area |
| Carlow |
40,642 |
12,157 |
8,112 |
29.2 |
20.0 |
| Kilkenny |
73,635 |
10,335 |
6,906 |
14.0 |
9.4 |
| Tipp South |
74,918 |
17,084 |
19,289 |
22.8 |
25.7 |
| Waterford |
91,624 |
7,858 |
23,737 |
8.6 |
25.9 |
| Wexford |
102,069 |
20,742 |
19,757 |
20.3 |
19.4 |
| SEHB |
382,888 |
68,176 |
7,7801 |
17.8 |
20.3 |
This shows that overall 20% of the population of each county living in the most deprived
areas (level 5) and that this varies considerably between counties from 9% in Kilkenny to
26% in Waterford and South Tipperary. The table also shows the proportion in each county
living in deprived areas (level 4), which again varies considerably.
Table 2.4 shows the proportion of people in each county that live in deprived areas,
(level 4 and 5), and also shows the proportion of the population of the South Eastern
Health Board region as a whole, that live in deprived areas in each county.
Table 2.4 The proportion of the population in each county that live in deprived
areas (Level 4 + 5, Column 3) and the proportion of the population of the SEHB region that
live in deprived areas in each county (Column 4)
| County |
County
Population |
County
Level 4 & 5 Population |
%
County Population in area Level 4 & 5 |
%
Regional Pop. in deprived areas in the county (Level 4&5) |
| Carlow |
40,642 |
20,269 |
49.9 |
5.3 |
| Kilkenny |
73,635 |
17,241 |
23.4 |
4.5 |
| Tipp South |
74,918 |
36,373 |
48.6 |
9.5 |
| Waterford |
91,624 |
31,595 |
34.5 |
8.3 |
| Wexford |
102,069 |
40,499 |
39.7 |
10.6 |
| SEHB |
382,888 |
145,977 |
38.1 |
38.1 |
Source: Small Area Research Unit
It can be seen that while Carlow (50%) and South Tipperary
(49%) have the largest proportions of people living in deprived areas within their
counties, Wexford (11%) followed by South Tipperary (9%) have the highest proportions of
the population of the region living in deprived areas.
Figure 2.1 Material Deprivation Index for Carlow by DED

Source: Small Area Research Unit
Figure 2.1 shows the material deprivation index for Carlow. Five DEDs had deprivation
level 5, i.e. the "most deprived". These were; Rathvilly, Graigue urban,
Bagenalstown urban, Tullow urban and Hackettstown. A total of 8,112 people live in the
"most deprived" areas, which represents 20% of the population of the county. A
further six DEDs had deprivation level of 4 which is also "deprived". These were
Myshall, Clogrennan, Carlow urban, Fenagh, Coonogue and Borris. A total of 20,569 people
lived in these deprived DED areas, (level 4 and 5). This represents a large proportion
(50%) of the population of County Carlow.
This high proportion of the population of the county, living in deprived areas and the
knowledge that average health status of the people of Carlow is poorer than the rest of
the region, warrants particular resources to be targeted at Carlow.
Figure 2.2 Material Deprivation Index for Kilkenny by DED

Source: Small Area Research Unit
Figure 2.2 shows the deprivation index for Co. Kilkenny. There were three DED levels
with index level 5, the most deprived. These were Urlingford, Kilkenny No. 1 urban and
Callan urban. A total of 6,906 people live in the "most deprived" areas, which
represents 9% of the population of the county. There were nine DEDs with the deprived
index of 4. These were Castlecomer, Freshford, Jerpoint Church, Pollrone, Graiguenamanagh,
Ballyragget, Goresbridge, Johnstown and Clogh. A total of 17,241 people lived in these
deprived areas (level 4 and 5). This represent 23% of the population of Co. Kilkenny.
Figure 2.3 Material Deprivation Index for Waterford by DED
(This image is currently unavailable.)
Figure 2.3 gives the deprivation index for Waterford. There were twenty one DEDs with
index level 5, the most deprived. These were; Ballybeg North, Larchville, Roanmore,
Morrison's Avenue West, Morrison's Road, Shortcourse, Lisduggan, Mount Sion, Custom House
B, The Glen, Military Road, Grange South, Newport Square, Morrison's Avenue East, Centre
A, Slieve Keale, Custom House A, Kilmeadan, Dungarvan No. 1, Kilmacthomas and Portlaw.
Seventeen of these twenty most deprived areas were within Waterford County Borough. A
total of 23,737 people live in the "most deprived" areas, which represents 26%
of the population of the county. There were thirteen DEDs with a deprivation index of 4.
These were; King's Meadow, Ballybricken, Poleberry, Ferrybank, Park, Garden Morris,
Clonea, Carrigcastle, Ardmore, Comeragh, Kinsalebeg, Kilmacomma and Newtown. Four of these
twelve areas in level 4 were within the county borough. A total of 32,014 people lived
within the deprived areas in Waterford City and County (level 4 and 5). This represents
34% of the population of the Waterford.
Figure 2.4 Material Deprivation Index for South Tipperary

Source: Small Area Research Unit
Figure 2.4 shows the material deprivation index for South Tipperary Riding. There were
seven DEDs with a deprivation index of 5. These were; Carrick-on-Suir urban,
(Tipperary East urban, Clonmel West urban, New Birmingham, Ballingarry, Fethard, and
Cashel urban). A total of 17,084 people live in the "most deprived" areas, which
represents 23% of the population of the county. There were a further 18 DEDs with a
deprivation index of 4. These were Carrickbeg urban, Killenaule, Mullinahone, Ballyphilip,
Tipperary West urban, Ardfinnan, Buolick, Farranrory, Bansha, Kilcommon, Newtown, Clonmel
rural, Lisronagh, Ballykisteen, Clogheen, Golden, Peppardstown and Cappagh. A total of
36,373 people lived within these deprived areas (level 4 and 5) within the county. This
represented 49% of the population of Tipperary South.
Figure 2.5 Material Deprivation Index for Wexford

Source: Small Area Research Unit
Figure 2.5 shows the material deprivation index for Wexford. There were six DEDs with
deprivation index level of 5. These were; Enniscorthy rural, Enniscorthy urban, New Ross
urban, Taghmon, Wexford M.B., and Rosbercon urban. A total of 19,757 people live in the
"most deprived" areas, which represents 19% of the population of the county.
There were an additional eighteen with a deprivation index level of 4. These were Ferns,
Ballycanew, Gorey urban, Clonroche, Newtownbarry, Ballyhoge, Ballygarret, Monamolin,
Lady's Island, Gorey rural, Killincooly, Enniscorthy rural, Kilmokea, Ballindaggan,
Kilcomb, Ballycarney, Coolgreaney and Fethard. A total of 40,499 people lived in deprived
areas (level 4 and 5) in Co. Wexford. This represents 40% of the population in Wexford. |
 |
| 5. Conclusion The
information presented identifies specific small areas which experience the highest levels
of material deprivation in the South Eastern Health Board region. The link between
deprivation and health and well being is well established. Therefore socio-economic
inequalities are important in planning services to achieve health equalities and health
and social gain.
It is recommended that:
The provision of health services to deprived areas be reviewed to ensure equality of
access and to begin to address health inequalities. Services which have been shown to
impact on health inequalities should be identified and targeted to deprived areas.
References
1 Townsend P, Davidson N. Inequalities in
Health, The Black Report. Harmonds Worth;
Penquin. 1982.
2 Nolan B. Socio Economic Differences in Ireland. Economic and Social
Review 1990;
21(2):193-208.
3 Lyons RA et al. Social Class and Chronic Illness in Dublin. Irish
Medical Journal 1996;
89:174-176.
4 Johnson Z, Lyons R. Socio Economic Factors and Mortality in Small
Areas. Irish Medical
Journal 1993; 86 (2): 60 - 62.
5 Johnson Z, Dack P. Small Area Mortality Patterns. Irish Medical Journal
1989;
82 (3): 105-108.
6 Davey-Smith G, Bartley M, Blane D. The Black Report on Social Economic
Inequalities Ten
Years On. British Medical Journal 1990;301:373-7.
7 Davey-Smith G, Hart C, Blane D, Gillis C, Hawthorne V. Lifetime
socioeconomic position and
mortality: prospective observational study. British Medical Journal
1997;314: 547-52.
8 Davey-Smith G, Hart C, Blane D, Hole D. Adverse socio-economic
conditions in childhood
and cause specific adult mortality: prospective observational study.
British Medical Journal 1998; 316: 1631-5.
9 Wilkinson RG. Socioeconomic determinants of of health. Health
inequalities: relative or
absolute material standards. British Medical Journal 1997; 314: 519-5.
10 Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. Health and social cohesion: why care about income
inequality?.
British Medical Journal 1997; 314 : 1037-40.
11 Small Area Research Unit. Development of a National Deprivation
Index.Trinity College,
Dublin, Report No. 2, 1997. |
 |
|